龙和什么属相相克| 隐血十一是什么意思| 三月十二是什么星座| 凤凰长什么样子| 农历9月17日是什么星座| 阁下是什么意思| 一个马一个襄念什么| 巴雷特是什么| 什么情况下需做肠镜| 18k黄金是什么意思| 章鱼属于什么类动物| 幽门螺旋杆菌用什么药| 打狗是什么意思| 脸上长痘痘用什么药膏效果好| 世界7大奇迹是什么| 1878年属什么生肖| 耳朵疼什么原因| 1985属什么| 法国的货币叫什么| 怀孕什么时候有反应| 急性扁桃体化脓是什么原因引起的| 吃什么水果对皮肤好又美白| cea是什么意思| 心衰有什么症状| 五月十七号是什么星座| 袁绍和袁术是什么关系| 去海边玩需要带什么| 白蛋白偏高是什么意思| 海参不能和什么一起吃| tct是检查什么的| 糖化血红蛋白是什么| 为什么放生泥鳅果报大| 友五行属什么| 迎春花什么时候开| 心急吃不了热豆腐什么意思| 哈喇子是什么意思| 冰粉是什么| 什么是dha| 财大气粗是什么意思| 2010年属虎的是什么命| 最短的季节是什么| 二月二十三日是什么星座| 米加参念什么| 垫底是什么意思| 疱疹有什么症状表现| 杨花是什么| 共振是什么意思| 有眼袋是什么原因| 什么叫做质量| 喝什么汤下奶最快最多| 玻璃体混浊用什么药| 西瓜和什么榨汁好喝| 什么叫转基因| 鼻饲是什么意思| hr是什么职业| 坛城是什么意思| 死了妻子的男人叫什么| 89年属蛇是什么命| 食字五行属什么| 维生素c阳性是什么意思| 水肺潜水是什么意思| 深圳到香港需要办理什么手续| 梦见四条蛇是什么意思| 什么是超话| 声音嘶哑是什么原因| 女人吃槐花有什么好处| 待产是什么意思| 甲沟炎用什么药| 辰五行属什么| 脚冰凉是什么原因| b超属于什么科室| 耳膜穿孔吃什么长得快| 孩子营养不良吃什么| m代表什么意思| 痔疮为什么会出血| 动脉斑块是什么意思| 马克杯是什么| 十一月一号是什么星座| tid是什么意思| cr是什么检查| 什么的季节| 猴和什么属相相冲相克| 什么时候立夏| 天枢是什么意思| 赤茯苓又叫什么| 老年人吃什么奶粉好| 楼梯步数有什么讲究| 尿路感染需要做什么检查| 冬天喝什么茶最好| 什么米最贵| 日月星辰是什么意思| 没意思是什么意思| 台风是什么意思| 肝火是什么原因引起的| 偶数和奇数是什么意思| 静脉曲张是什么症状| 卡西欧手表什么档次| 男人经常熬夜炖什么汤| 一什么酒店| 蛇进家里是什么预兆| 七月11日是什么星座| 苹果手机为什么那么贵| 天热头疼吃什么药| 85年属什么的生肖| 惹是什么意思| 无济于事的济是什么意思| 屁股又叫什么| 虎皮膏药有什么功效| 孕妇喝什么牛奶好| 赵云的马叫什么| 祭坛是什么意思| 皮肤属于什么系统| 9月10日是什么节| 品学兼优是什么意思| 生蚝和什么不能一起吃| 尤加一笔是什么字| 慢性心肌炎有什么症状| 怀孕应该注意什么| 腿肚子抽筋是什么原因| dha中文叫什么| 泡芙是什么| 什么和什么| 经期血块多是什么原因| mdzz是什么意思| 属猪五行属什么| 什么居什么业| 为什么会反胃想吐| 多愁善感的动物是什么生肖| 勃艮第红是什么颜色| 白细胞十十是什么意思| 护士资格证有什么用| 吃空饷什么意思| 菊花泡水喝有什么好处| 小便尿起泡是什么原因| 癔症是什么| 鸽子不能和什么一起吃| 莫须有什么意思| 什么争鸣成语| 喝枸杞有什么好处| 小壁虎吃什么| 鲤鱼最爱吃什么食物| 什么东西最补肾| 固执的人是什么性格| 老人脚肿是什么原因| 表姐的女儿叫什么| 小资情调是什么意思| 痔疮挂什么科| 梦见香蕉是什么意思| 旧人是什么意思| 吃什么补充维生素c| 房门什么颜色好看| 藏红花是什么| 程度是什么意思| tpc是什么意思| 延时吃什么药| 满足是什么意思| 云南白药气雾剂保险液有什么作用| 做梦来月经了什么预兆| 1984年什么命| 什么至什么来| 烧烤用什么油| 召力念什么| 什么食物含蛋白质高| cmr医学中什么意思| 熬夜对肾有什么影响| 生肖猴和什么生肖相冲| 神经内科和神经外科有什么区别| 复诊是什么意思| 雷震子是什么神| 北京市副市长是什么级别| 为什么说啄木鸟是树的医生| 埋汰什么意思| 0中间有一横是什么字体| 胆汁反流什么症状| 一个月大的小狗吃什么| 印度人口什么时候超过中国| 马齿苋是什么| 经常放屁是什么原因造成的| 割痔疮后吃什么恢复快| 驻外大使是什么级别| 腰果不能和什么一起吃| 24k黄金是什么意思| 老鸹是什么鸟| 孕期便秘吃什么通便快| 梦见打狼是什么预兆| 骨质硬化是什么意思| 前列腺炎有什么症状| 彼岸花开是什么意思| 什么的事| 脾胃虚寒有什么症状| 肚脐眼左侧是什么器官| 硅胶是什么材料| 失态是什么意思| 甲状腺减退什么症状| 大象的鼻子有什么作用| 脱毛膏是什么原理| 皈依是什么意思| 甲功是查什么的| 7月11号什么星座| 枸杞加红枣泡水喝有什么功效| 男人时间短吃什么药好| 辣子鸡属于什么菜系| 胡同是什么意思| 上海古代叫什么| 梦见杀鸡见血什么征兆| 高危型hpv有什么症状| 玄青色是什么颜色| 肠胃不好吃什么| 高血压什么症状| 波罗蜜多什么意思| 像狐狸的狗是什么狗| 猫咪不能吃什么| 片状低回声区什么意思| 张柏芝和谢霆锋为什么离婚| 肛门疼是什么原因| 火是什么| 拉肚子是什么原因引起的| 美尼尔症是什么病| 手淫有什么危害| 塔罗牌是什么| 柳对什么| 血痰是什么原因| 腰间盘突出压迫神经腿疼吃什么药| 鬼剃头是因为什么原因引起的| 宝宝消化不良吃什么| 肠易激综合征吃什么药好| 表虚不固是什么意思| 踩水是什么意思| 紧张吃什么药| 缺钙会出现什么症状| 为什么月经每个月提前| 贫乳是什么意思| 性病是什么症状| 晚上七点多是什么时辰| 促甲状腺激素高是什么原因| 血压忽高忽低是什么原因| 痘痘破了涂什么药膏| 骨质疏松有什么症状| 1996年属什么的| 国字脸适合什么发型| alan英文名什么意思| 做梦来月经了什么预兆| 21三体临界风险是什么意思| 一天吃一个苹果有什么好处| 例假一个月来两次是什么原因| r级电影是什么意思| 郭字五行属什么| 宝宝手脚冰凉是什么原因| 腰疼肚子疼是什么原因引起的| 硬卧是什么样子的| 保胎吃什么药| 吉加页读什么| 12月29号是什么星座| 碗打碎了预示着什么| 什么是辅警| 甲减喝什么药| 痔疮是什么意思| 7.2号是什么星座| 玩微博的都是什么人| 真实写照的意思是什么| 上海有什么玩的| 什么夫妻百事哀| hpv是什么引起的| 为什么尽量不打免疫球蛋白| 百度Jump to content

国防部回应美军舰进入我南海岛礁邻近海域:是严重挑衅

Coordinates: 59°23′N 21°41′E / 59.383°N 21.683°E / 59.383; 21.683
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sinking of the MS Estonia
One of Estonia's inflatable life rafts, filled with water
Date28 September 1994; 30 years ago (2025-08-05)
Time00:50–01:50 (UTC+2)
Duration1 hour
LocationBaltic Sea
Coordinates59°23′N 21°41′E? / ?59.383°N 21.683°E? / 59.383; 21.683
TypeMaritime disaster
Participants989; 137 survivors
Deaths852
百度 今笔者将“大成”一词引入中国古代文体学中,意在说明,相对而言,中国文化主合,西方文化主分,所以,大成文体“原产”和“盛产”于中国,无愧于我国的文化珍藏。

MS Estonia, a cruiseferry built in 1980, sank on Wednesday, 28 September 1994, between about 00:50 and 01:50 (UTC+2) as the ship was crossing the Baltic Sea, en route from Tallinn, Estonia, to Stockholm, Sweden. The sinking was one of the worst maritime disasters of the 20th century.[1][2] It is one of the deadliest peacetime sinkings of a European ship, after the Titanic in 1912 and the Empress of Ireland in 1914, and the deadliest peacetime shipwreck to have occurred in European waters, with 852 (out of 989) lives lost.[3]

Final voyage

[edit]

Estonia departed slightly behind schedule at 19:15 on 27 September and was expected in Stockholm the next morning at about 09:00. She was afterwards stated as carrying 989 people: 803 passengers and 186 crew.[4]:?137?[JAIC 1]

Most of the passengers were Swedish, although some were of Estonian origin; most of the crew were Estonian. The ship was fully loaded, and was listing slightly to starboard because of poor cargo distribution.[4]:?138?

According to the final disaster report, the weather was rough, with a wind of 15 to 25 m/s (29 to 49 kn; 34 to 56 mph), force 7–10 on the Beaufort scale[5][6] and a significant wave height of 4 to 6 m (13 to 20 ft)[JAIC 2] compared with the highest measured significant wave height in the Baltic Sea of 7.7 m (25 ft 3 in).[7] Esa M?kel?, the captain of Silja Europa who was appointed on-scene commander for the subsequent rescue effort, described the weather as "normally bad", or like a typical autumn storm in the Baltic Sea. According to modelled satellite data[clarification needed], gusts were in the excess of 85–100 km/h (24–28 m/s) at 01:00 that night over the Baltic Sea, although the ship had not yet reached the areas with the heaviest gusts before its sinking.[8] There was some rain and temperatures around 10 °C (50 °F).[8] All scheduled passenger ferries were at sea, something not unusual for this weather in the Baltic Sea. The official report says that while the exact speed at the time of the accident is not known, Estonia had very regular voyage times, averaging 16 to 17 kn (30 to 31 km/h). The chief mate of the Viking Line cruiseferry Mariella tracked Estonia's speed by radar at approximately 14.2 kn (26.3 km/h) before the first signs of distress, while the Silja Europa's officers estimated her speed at 14 to 15 kn (26 to 28 km/h) at midnight.

Sinking

[edit]

The first sign of trouble aboard Estonia was when a metallic bang was heard, presumably caused by a heavy wave hitting the bow doors around 01:00, when the ship was on the outskirts of the Turku archipelago, but an inspection—limited to checking the indicator lights for the ramp and visor—showed no problems.[4]:?138? Over the next 10 minutes, similar noises were reported by passengers and other crew.[4]:?138? At about 01:15, the visor is believed to have separated and torn open the loading ramp behind it. The ship immediately took on a heavy starboard list (initially around 15 degrees, but by 01:30, the ship had rolled 60 degrees and by 01:50 the list was 90 degrees) as water flooded into the vehicle deck.[4]:?138? Estonia was turned to port and slowed before her four engines cut out completely.[4]:?138?

At about 01:20, a quiet female voice called "H?ire, h?ire, laeval on h?ire", Estonian for "Alarm, alarm, there is alarm on the ship", over the public address system, which was followed immediately by an internal alarm for the crew, then one minute later by the general emergency signal. The vessel's rapid list and the flooding prevented many people in the cabins from ascending to the boat deck, as water not only flooded the vessel via the car deck, but also through windows in cabins as well as the massive windows along deck 6. The windows gave way to the powerful waves as the ship listed and the sea reached the upper decks. Survivors reported that water flowed down from ceiling panels, stairwells and along corridors from decks that were not yet underwater. This contributed to the rapid sinking.[4]:?138? A mayday was communicated by the ship's crew at 01:22, but did not follow international formats. Estonia directed a call to Silja Europa and only after making contact with her did the radio operator utter the word "Mayday". The radio operator on Silja Europa, chief mate Teijo Seppelin, replied in English: "Estonia, are you calling mayday?" After that, the voice of third mate Andres Tammes took over on Estonia and the conversation shifted to Finnish.[9]

Tammes was able to provide some details about their situation but, due to a loss of power, he could not give their position, which delayed rescue operations somewhat. Tammes would later die in the sinking. Some minutes later, power returned (or somebody on the bridge managed to lower themselves to the starboard side of the bridge to check the marine GPS, which will display the ship's position even in blackout conditions), and the Estonia was able to radio its position to Silja Europa and Mariella. After that, Estonia sent their last radio message saying: "Todella paha, todella pahalta n?ytt?? nyt t?ss? kyll?" (in English: "Really bad, it's looking really bad right now."). The ship disappeared from the radar screens of other ships at around 01:50,[4]:?138? and sank at 59°23′N 21°41′E? / ?59.383°N 21.683°E? / 59.383; 21.683 in international waters, about 22 nmi (41 km) on bearing 157° from Ut? island, Finland, to a depth of 74 to 85 m (245 to 280 ft) of water. According to survivor accounts, the ship sank stern first after taking a list of 90 degrees.

Rescue effort

[edit]

Search and rescue followed arrangements set up under the 1979 International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (the SAR Convention), and the nearest Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre MRCC Turku coordinated the effort in accordance with Finland's plans. The Baltic is one of the world's busiest shipping areas, with 2,000 vessels at sea at any time, and these plans assumed the ship's own boats and nearby ferries would provide immediate help and that helicopters could be airborne after an hour. This scheme had worked for the relatively small number of accidents involving sinkings, particularly as most ships have few people on board.[10]

Super Puma OH-HVG of the Finnish Border Guard flying

Mariella, the first of five ferries to reach the scene of the accident, arrived at 02:12.[1] MRCC Turku failed to acknowledge the Mayday immediately and Mariella's report was relayed by Helsinki Radio as the less urgent pan-pan message. A full-scale emergency was only declared at 02:30. Mariella winched open liferafts into the sea onto which 13 people on Estonia's rafts successfully transferred, and reported the location of other rafts to Swedish and Finnish rescue helicopters, the first of which arrived at 03:05. The former took survivors to shore, while the latter—Finnish border guard helicopters Super Puma OH-HVG and Agusta Bell 412 OH-HVD—chose the riskier option of landing on the ferries. The pilot of OH-HVG stated that landing on the ferries was the most difficult part of the whole rescue operation; despite that, this single helicopter rescued 44 people, more than all the ferries. MS Isabella saved 16 survivors with its rescue slide.

Victims

[edit]
Nationalities Missing Survivors Identified
bodies
Total
Sweden 461 51 40 552
Estonia 237 62 47 346
Latvia 19 6 4 29
Russia 10 4 1 15
Finland 9 3 1 13
Norway 6 3 0 9
Germany 4 3 1 8
Denmark 5 1 0 6
Lithuania 3 1 0 4
Morocco 2 0 0 2
Netherlands 1 1 0 2
Ukraine 1 1 0 2
United Kingdom 1 1 0 2
Belarus 1 0 0 1
Canada 1 0 0 1
France 1 0 0 1
Nigeria 1 0 0 1
Total 757 137 94 989

Of the 989 on board, 138 were rescued, one of whom died later in hospital.[1] Ships rescued 34 and helicopters 104; the ferries played a much smaller part than the planners had intended because it was too dangerous to launch their man-overboard (MOB) boats or lifeboats. The accident claimed 852 lives. Most died by drowning and hypothermia, as the water temperature was 10–11 °C (50–52 °F).

One of the victims of the sinking was the Estonian singer Urmas Alender. In total, 94 bodies were recovered: 93 within 33 days of the accident, and the last victim was found 18 months later.[1] By the time the rescue helicopters arrived, around a third of those who escaped from the Estonia had died of hypothermia, while fewer than half of those who had managed to leave the ship were eventually rescued.[1] The survivors of the shipwreck were mostly young males. Of all those who survived 111 were men and only 26 were women. [11] Seven over 55 years of age survived and there were no survivors under age 12. About 650 people were still inside the ship when it sank.[JAIC 1] The commission estimated that up to 310 passengers reached the outer decks, 160 of whom boarded the life-rafts or lifeboats.[12]

Official investigation and report

[edit]
The bow visor after recovery at the Swedish naval base on Musk? Island.

The wreck was examined and videotaped by remotely operated underwater vehicles and by divers from a Norwegian company, Rockwater A/S, contracted for the investigation work.[JAIC 3] The official report indicated that the locks on the bow door had failed from the strain of the waves and the door had separated from the rest of the vessel, pulling the ramp behind it ajar.[JAIC 4] The bow visor and ramp had been torn off at points that would not trigger an "open" or "unlatched" warning on the bridge, as is the case in normal operation or failure of the latches. The bridge was also situated too far back on the ferry for the visor to be seen from there.[JAIC 5] While there was video monitoring of the inner ramp, the monitor on the bridge was not visible from the conning station.[JAIC 6] The bow visor was under-designed, as the ship's manufacturing and approval processes did not consider the visor and its attachments as critical items regarding ship safety.[4]:?139? The first metallic bang was believed to have been the sound of the visor's lower locking mechanism failing, and that the subsequent noises would have been from the visor 'flapping' against the hull as the other locks failed, before tearing free and exposing the bow ramp.[4]:?139–140? The subsequent failure of the bow ramp allowed water into the vehicle deck, which was identified as the main cause of the capsizing and sinking:[4]:?139? RORO ferries with their wide vehicle decks are particularly vulnerable to capsizing if the vehicle deck is even slightly flooded because of free surface effect: the fluid's swirling motion across such a large area hampers the boat's ability to right itself after rolling with a wave. The same effect had caused the capsizing of MS Herald of Free Enterprise seven years earlier.

The report was critical of the crew's actions, particularly for failing to reduce speed before investigating the noises emanating from the bow, and for being unaware that the list was being caused by water entering the vehicle deck.[4]:?142? There were also general criticisms of the delays in sounding the alarm, the passivity of the crew, and the lack of guidance from the bridge.

Recommendations for modifications to be applied to similar ships included separation of the condition sensors from the latch and hinge mechanisms.[JAIC 7]

Changes stemming from the disaster

[edit]

In 1999, special training requirements in crowd and crisis management and human behaviour were extended to crew on all passenger ships, and amendments were made to watch-keeping standards.[13] Estonia's distress beacons or EPIRBs required manual activation, which did not happen. Had they been activated automatically, it would have been immediately obvious that the ship was in distress and the location would have been clear. All EPIRBs were subsequently required to deploy automatically and the accident was "instrumental in the move to legislate Voyage Data Recorders".[14] New International Maritime Organization (IMO) Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) liferaft regulations for rescue from listing ships in rough water were introduced.[15]

New designs, the "citadel concept" once again influenced by Estonia, aim to ensure damaged ships have sufficient buoyancy to remain afloat, though cost will determine if any are built. SOLAS 90, which came into effect in 2010, specifies existing passenger ships' stability requirements and those in North West Europe must also be able to survive 50 cm (20 in) of water on the car deck.[16]

2020 investigation

[edit]

On 28 September 2020, a Swedish documentary was released which used underwater equipment to film the wreck. This investigation found a 4-metre hole in the ship's hull. This prompted the Estonian prime minister and foreign minister to meet with their Swedish and Finnish equivalents and announce that a "new technical investigation" would take place.[17]

The head of the Estonian investigation, Margus Kurm, stated publicly that he believes this new information points to a collision with a submarine and that the hole could not have happened post-sinking.[18] In October 2020, the Estonian government published a report stating that the hole was too small to have sunk the ship as quickly as it did.[19] The Swedish documentary makers were prosecuted for violating the sanctity of the wreck, but were acquitted on 8 February 2021 as the diving happened on a German ship in international waters. Germany had not signed the treaty that declares sanctity over the site.[20] However, as a result of a retrial in September 2022, the filmmakers were finally found guilty and fined.[21]

By June 2021, laws allowing the examination of the wreck for investigation of the disaster were passed in the Swedish and Estonian Parliaments.[22] Shortly after, the Swedish Accident Investigation Authority announced their plan to conduct dives at the grave site starting in July 2021.[23] In July 2023, the car ramp was retrieved.[24]

2023 intermediate report

[edit]

Between 2021 and 2022, Estonian, Finnish and Swedish authorities carried out comprehensive wreck surveys[25] using cameras, 3D photogrammetry, 3D laser scanners, and shallow- and mid-penetration sub-bottom profilers, among other equipment. This was to identify the cause of penetrating deformation(s) to the hull of MS Estonia and assess whether the safety investigation of the sinking should be re-opened.

In January 2023, the Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK) released the Intermediate Report of the Preliminary Assessment of MS Estonia[26] following the joint investigation. According to the report, there was "no indication of a collision with a vessel or a floating object", neither was there "indication of an explosion in the bow area".[26][27] Also an oil leak was found on the hull's aft section and that the Finnish Border Guard is monitoring the leakage.[28]

It was also concluded that the ship was "not seaworthy" and its certificate of seaworthiness, issued 28 January 1993, was incorrect, because

  • an inspection of the bow parts following regulations, which would have led to the discovery of the flaws in the visor, was not performed, and
  • the exemption regarding the location of the bow ramp as the upper extension of the collision bulkhead was not recorded in certificates.

The report also concluded that if the inspection was performed and the exemption noted, "the vessel would not have been trading the Tallinn–Stockholm route", and "the accident would probably not have occurred".

The bow ramp and some metal parts that were cut from the hull by divers in the 1990s were salvaged in July 2023.[29][30]

Effects of the disaster

[edit]

The disaster had a major impact on ferry safety, leading to changes in safety regulations as well as in life-raft design,[31] much as the RMS Titanic disaster did in 1912.

Conspiracy theories

[edit]

Conspiracy theories exist about the cause of the sinking. German journalist Jutta Rabe and the British magazine New Statesman claim that laboratory tests on debris recovered illegally from Estonia's bow yielded trace evidence of a deliberate explosion, which they allege was concealed by the Swedish, British, and Russian governments to cover up an intelligence operation smuggling military hardware via the civilian ferry.[32] Members of the Joint Accident Investigation Commission denied these claims, saying that the damage seen on the debris occurred during the visor's detachment from the vessel. The JAIC cited results from Germany's Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, which found that Jutta Rabe's samples did not prove an explosion occurred.[33]

Transportation of military equipment

[edit]

In the autumn of 2004, a former Swedish customs officer claimed on Sveriges Television that Estonia had been used to transport former Soviet military equipment in September 1994.[34] The Swedish and Estonian governments subsequently launched separate investigations, which both confirmed that non-explosive military equipment was aboard the ship on 14 and 20 September 1994. According to the Swedish Ministry of Defence, no such equipment was on board on the day of the disaster, and previous investigations by the Swedish Customs Service found no reports of any anomalous activity around the day of the disaster.[35][36]

Protection of the wreck

[edit]
Estonia memorial in Tallinn
Estonia memorial in Stockholm

In the aftermath of the disaster, many relatives of the deceased demanded that their loved ones be raised from international waters and given a land burial. Demands were also made that the entire ship be raised so that the cause of the disaster could be discovered by detailed inspection.[37][4]:?140? Citing the practical difficulties and the moral implications of raising decaying bodies from the sea floor (the majority of the bodies were never recovered), and fearing the financial burden of lifting the entire hull to the surface and the salvage operation, the Swedish government suggested burying the whole ship in situ with a shell of concrete.[38][39]

As a preliminary step, thousands of tons of pebbles were dropped on the site.[4]:?140? The Estonia Agreement 1995, a treaty among Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Denmark, Russia and the United Kingdom, declared sanctity over the site, prohibiting their citizens from even approaching the wreck.[40] The treaty is, however, only binding for citizens of the countries that are signatories. At least twice, the Swedish Navy has discovered diving operations at the wreck. The wreck's location is monitored on radar by the Finnish Navy.[41]

Media

[edit]

The sinking of the Estonia has been the subject of a number of documentaries in addition to the feature film Baltic Storm, including:

  • History Channel: Sinking of the Estonia
  • Zero Hour: The Sinking of the Estonia (2006)
  • Built from Disaster: Ships (2009)[42]
  • Discovery Plus: Estonia (2020)[43]

It was also mentioned in the Swedish film Force Majeure.[44]

Estonia, a Finnish eight-part television series about MS Estonia's accident, was produced by Fisher King company for the Nordic streaming service C More and released in 2023. According to the creators behind the series, the effort was said to be the most expensive drama series ever produced in Finland.[45][46]

In addition, the disaster has inspired several musical works:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Soomer, H.; Ranta, H.; Penttil?, A. (2001). "Identification of victims from the M/S Estonia". International Journal of Legal Medicine. 114 (4–5): 259–262. doi:10.1007/s004140000180. PMID 11355406. S2CID 38587050.
  2. ^ Boesten, E. (2006): The M/S Estonia Disaster and the Treatment of Human Remains. In: Bierens, J.J.L.M. (ed.): Handbook on Drowning: 650–652. ISBN 978-3-540-43973-8.
  3. ^ "Estonia shipwreck investigator and nautical linguist Captain Uno Laur dies". ERR. 8 October 2018. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Whittingham, Robert B. (2004). "Design errors". The Blame Machine: why human error causes accidents. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-7506-5510-0.
  5. ^ "Windschaal van Beaufort" (in Dutch). KNMI (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute. 3 December 2023.
  6. ^ "Beaufort wind force scale". MetOffice. 3 December 2023.
  7. ^ "Wave height records in the Baltic Sea". Finnish Meteorological Institute. Archived from the original on 30 September 2009.
  8. ^ a b "Ventusky - Wind, rain and temperature maps". Ventusky. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
  9. ^ "Estonia final report. 2.1 The Distress Communication". estoniaferrydisaster.net. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 24 June 2018.
  10. ^ HELCOM reports a noticeable drop in shipping accidents in the Baltic Archived 27 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 21 October 2007
  11. ^ "L?hedased m?lestasid parvlaeval Estonia hukkunuid".
  12. ^ "Improving passenger ship safety" (PDF). Directorate-General for Transport and Energy (European Commission). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2008. Retrieved 30 September 2007.
  13. ^ "Passenger information required on all passenger ships from 1 January 1999". International Maritime Organization. Archived from the original on 12 November 2007. Retrieved 21 October 2007.
  14. ^ Simplified Voyage Data Recorders– Why choose float free Archived 12 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 22 October 2007
  15. ^ Liferaft Systems Australia: Maib Interim Safety Recommendation on The Use of Vertical Chute Type Marine Evacuation Systems Archived 29 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 21 October 2007
  16. ^ Sturcke, James (6 March 2007). "Herald of sea changes". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 November 2007.
  17. ^ Tambur, Silver (28 September 2020). "Documentary: MS Estonia has a large hole in the hull". Estonian World. Retrieved 28 September 2020.
  18. ^ Kristjan Kallaste (29 September 2020). "Head of MS Estonia investigation: Estonia sank on collision with submarine". Eesti Rahvusringh??ling. Retrieved 29 September 2020.
  19. ^ "Hull damage not to blame for 1994 MS Estonia disaster: new report". euronews. 23 October 2020. Retrieved 24 April 2021.
  20. ^ "Swedes acquitted of desecrating sunken ferry with robot dive". AP NEWS. 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  21. ^ "Film-makers found guilty of disturbing 1994 MS Estonia ferry wreck". The Guardian. 2025-08-05. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  22. ^ Riksdagsf?rvaltningen (2025-08-05). "Better opportunities to investigate the sinking of the MS Estonia". riksdagen.se. Archived from the original on 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  23. ^ "Sweden announcing plan to examine Estonia ferry wreck". The Baltic Times. 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  24. ^ "Del fra Estonia er hentet opp – granskerne tror de finner svaret". Tu.no (in Norwegian). Teknisk Ukeblad. 25 July 2023.
  25. ^ "Preliminary assessment of new information about the sinking of the passenger ship M/S Estonia". Statens haverikommission. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
  26. ^ a b "Intermediate Report of the Preliminary Assessment of MV Estonia" (PDF). Statens haverikommission. January 23, 2023. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
  27. ^ "MS Estonia investigative committee rules out impact as shipwreck cause". ERR. 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  28. ^ haverikommission, statens (2025-08-05). "Intermediate Report of the Premliminary assessment of MV Estonia" (PDF).
  29. ^ "SALVAGE OF THE BOW RAMP". Statens Haverikommision. September 28, 2023.
  30. ^ Kirby, Paul (July 25, 2023). "Estonia sinking: Ramp from ferry wreck raised after 29 years". BBC.
  31. ^ Joughin, R.W. "The Revised SOLAS Regulations for Ro-Ro Ferries". Warsah Maritime Centre. Archived from the original on 3 April 2008. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  32. ^ Davis, Stephen (23 May 2005). "Death in the Baltic: the MI6 connection". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 12 July 2005. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  33. ^ Tukkim?ki, Paavo (20 February 2001). "Finnish Estonia Commission members still reject explosion theories". Helsingin Sanomat. Archived from the original on 12 May 2011.
  34. ^ Borgn?s, Lars (Fall 2004). "War materials smuggled on Estonia". Uppdrag granskning. Sveriges Television. Archived from the original on 13 June 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2009.
  35. ^ "Utredningen om transport av f?rsvarsmateriel p? M/S Estonia" (in Swedish). Ministry of Defence (Sweden). 21 January 2005.
  36. ^ "Riigikogu Committee of Investigation to Ascertain the Circumstances Related to the Export of Military Equipment from the Territory of the Republic of Estonia on the Ferry Estonia in 1994 – Final Report". Riigikogu. 19 December 2006. Archived from the original on 22 July 2011.
  37. ^ Wallius, Anniina (29 September 2004). "Estonian tuho lietsoi salaliittoteorioita" (in Finnish). YLE. Archived from the original on 12 May 2011.
  38. ^ "Justitieutskottets bet?nkande 1994/95: JuU23 Gravfrid ?ver m/s Estonia" (in Swedish). The Riksdag. 18 May 1995.
  39. ^ "Chapter 50: ?vert?ckningen stoppas". En granskning av Estoniakatastrofen och dess f?ljder. Statens offentliga utredningar (in Swedish). Vol. SOU 1998:132. Statens offentliga utredningar.
  40. ^ "Agreement between the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden regarding the M/S Estonia". Ministry for Foreign Affairs (Sweden). 23 February 1995.
  41. ^ Danné, Ulla; Nilsson, Birgitta /TT (18 May 1998). "Sj?fartsverket h?ll tyst om stoppade Estonia-dykare". Aftonbladet (in Swedish).
  42. ^ "Built From Disaster Season 1 Episode 2: Ships". TV Guide. Retrieved 29 September 2017.
  43. ^ "Discovery Plus: Estonia". Discovery+. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
  44. ^ Falzon, Christopher (2017). "Experiencing Force Majeure". Film-Philosophy. 21 (3): 281–298. doi:10.3366/film.2017.0052. hdl:1959.13/1350533.
  45. ^ M/S Estonia disaster TV series planned, billed as Finland's priciest-ever dramaYle News
  46. ^ Fisher King, CMore, MTV, TV4, Beta Film board Estonia series about ferry tragedyNordisk Film & TV Fond

General

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
无花果什么时候种植 鱼龙是什么 什么行业赚钱 天珠到底是什么 郎酒是什么香型
微针是什么美容项目 晚上失眠是什么原因 已读不回是什么意思 49年属什么生肖 效应是什么意思
头晕是什么感觉 腰酸是什么原因引起的 地贫和贫血有什么区别 车厘子是什么季节的水果 晚上没有睡意什么原因
通勤是什么意思 12月6日什么星座 办什么厂比较好 无性婚姻会有什么好处 德国是什么人种
dido是什么牌子hcv9jop3ns1r.cn 常温是什么意思hcv9jop6ns5r.cn 有胃火口臭怎么办吃什么药naasee.com 蛇盘疮吃什么药aiwuzhiyu.com 月经提前来是什么原因hcv7jop7ns3r.cn
夕阳朝乾是什么意思hcv9jop2ns6r.cn 脾虚可以吃什么水果hcv8jop9ns6r.cn 境内是什么意思hcv8jop5ns4r.cn 免疫十一项都检查什么hcv9jop2ns6r.cn 茶叶杀青是什么意思hcv7jop5ns6r.cn
腰间盘膨出和突出有什么区别hcv8jop4ns6r.cn nbr是什么材料hcv8jop9ns7r.cn 血液由什么和什么组成hcv9jop2ns8r.cn 手肿是什么病的前兆hcv7jop7ns1r.cn 什么是资本家hcv9jop8ns2r.cn
王昆念什么hcv7jop5ns0r.cn 钢琴10级是什么水平hcv8jop8ns0r.cn 什么样的情况下会怀孕hcv9jop3ns4r.cn 胃不舒服可以吃什么水果hcv8jop5ns6r.cn 哥哥的哥哥叫什么hcv8jop9ns7r.cn
百度